Grade: B
Story telling is an interesting process. There are so many
different ways that you can tell the same story. So many little changes can
make big differences in how we perceive the story. You can love or hate the
same story based off how it was told, and whether or not we know it we are all
aware of this. That’s because we all like to exploit it. You tell the story one
way to make you look better. The other person tells it a different way to
benefit them. Even if you get two people who are honestly trying to be
completely unbiased you will still get two different stories just because we
all perceive things differently. And this kind of sucks too because knowing
this means that when you hear the story you have to work to sift through what
is bias and what is fact.
I say this because after watching Sean Durkin’s Martha Marcy May Marlene I can’t help
but notice how similar yet how other worldly different it is from the Greek
film Dogtooth. Both are similar in subject. Martha is about a girl who joins
cult (lead by a charismatic psychopath) and two years later decides to leave,
only to then be haunted by the residual effects from her lifestyle while in the
cult. Dogtooth instead focuses on a family that has been isolated from society by
their patriarchal father, only to have their world fall to pieces when an
outsider is brought into the equation. So not exactly the same but very much
the same principal storylines apply. Stockholm syndrome, odd behavior
encouraged by the leader, and brain washing are a plenty in both films. They are
also filmed similarly in a very minimalist fashion. No fancy tricks with lenses
and such (although both have good cinematography). Also little music is heard to
give both an uncomfortable tone. The difference though (and a rather big one at
that) is that one is a very dark comedy (Dogtooth) and the other is a very
serious drama (Martha). See it’s all about how you tell a story.
Now for the review. As I noted earlier Martha is about a
girl named Martha. Martha joins a cult, but finds that the deeper she is
accepted into the cult’s inner circle the more out of hand things get. It
becomes too much for her and she eventually decides to run away. She ends up
living with her much older sister at their vacation house in Connecticut with
her and her husband. But of course as all this happens you don’t really know
any of this. The movie instead decides to tell the story more or less
backwards. It starts with her running away, and then through a series of
flashbacks we learn about why she chose to run away. It’s an interesting
storytelling choice because while (somewhat intentionally) confusing at times,
it works to give you more of an understanding of why Martha acts the way she
does now.
This is especially helpful because she acts very odd. She tries
to swim naked, casually walks in on her sister and husband having sex and
rather than leaving the room she curls up in bed with them, and thinks having
jobs and earning money is a flawed way of life. In probably the oddest scene of
this film, she pees herself while sleeping (which we actually see, it’s not
overly graphic I mean she is wearing a dress but it’s definitely one of those “did
that just happen” moments) and rather than wash the dress she is borrowing she
uses it to clean herself then just stuffs it under the mattress (actually I don’t
really understand that scene. I don’t really see what it was supposed to tell
us and while it helped it definitely wasn’t necessary for establishing
character. It’s just oddity for oddities sake, something this movie does a few
times to set the tone of the film). She also has complete breakdowns at what
seem like mundane moments. This is all thanks to the residual effects of her
life in a cult, and it makes it easier to understand this thanks to telling
most of the story through flashbacks.
Martha’s actions also work as interesting commentary on how
easily we can get conditioned to things, even if they are terrible. Before she
seems like she was a relatively normal girl, but now she does many different
odd things that she no longer finds odd thanks to being fully immersed in her
cult lifestyle. It makes life for her on the outside all that much more
difficult. It’s bad enough she is constantly haunted by the fear of them tracking
her down, but she also doesn’t fit into this new world either. She
simultaneously fears her old lifestyle and is nostalgic for its logic. It’s
like a child with an abusive parent who grows up to treat their kids the same
way. They hate the way their parent treated them, yet when it comes to
parenting that style is all they know. Its equal parts interesting and scary.
The movie does a great job of adding to this feeling by doing a lot of master
shots and long takes in large empty rooms. By pulling out on the camera and
showing everything, we see just how empty and solitary her life is now.
As we learn more about Martha’s cult life we learn that most
of it revolves around the group leader named Patrick (played by the brilliant
and ridiculously underrated John Hawkes). Patrick is like most cult leaders. He’s
very sure of his beliefs and he is charismatic enough to convince weak minded
people that his way of life is the right one. He runs a farm and has the men
that join go out and recruit new members. Once at the farm they will work all
over doing various chores. He treats the women like second class citizens as he
makes them make the meal and then wait to eat until the men have finished. He
also rapes all the women once. I say once because after he rapes them the first
time they are then convinced by the other women (who were at some point
originally convinced by him) that this act was not rape but rather a privilege and
part of their duty here at the farm. Then going forward they are more of a
willing party to these actions. He does other very bad things, but I don’t want
to ruin too much of the film for you so I will leave it at that.
Simply put, he is haunting. He has that type of sociopathic
logic that is insanely flawed yet seems to make enough sense to impressionable
people that they follow. At one point he gets one of the girls to kill a cat
because it is sick and needs to be put out of its misery. He then instantly ups
the ante and tries to get Martha (who he calls Marcy May because he calls the
girls by whatever he wants, probably as a way of establishing dominance) to
shoot one of the boys from the farm to prove a point to the boy and to see if
he could get her to do it. He’s always in control and will hurt you if you question
this fact.
This is pretty much the set up for the rest of the film. We
delve deeper and deeper into Martha’s cult life until we fully understand why
she left. We also simultaneously see her constantly at odds with her new life
at her sister’s place. Then the movie just sort of ends. It’s really odd too.
Everything seems so well thought out, but then there is absolutely no ending.
Well there sort of is, but it’s ambiguous and very abrupt. It’s this movie’s
one big glaring flaw and it’s too bad as everything else was almost pitch
perfect. If you are wondering about the grade, this ending is what held this
movie back from creeping up to the B+ to A- range.
To contrast, the acting was top notch. This movie is carried
by two characters: Martha and Patrick. If they didn’t get the right people for
these parts this whole movie could have easily fallen apart. There was a lot of
buzz about Elizabeth Olsen’s performance in this movie and it is all just. She
is on the screen probably around 90% of the time in this movie and this was
very much a role she had to go all in with and she did. I wouldn’t say she is a
surefire star in the making, because I wasn’t naturally drawn to her like a
superstar and she was overshadowed at times, but she definitely has the chops
to be a big name in Hollywood. The person who would sometimes overshadow her
was John Hawkes. To anyone who has seen Winter’s Bone this is no surprise as he
was fantastic as the scary meth addict Teardrop. He is also quite terrifying in
this film too but in a completely different way. His unwavering confidence and
sociopathic behavior were chilling. I found myself excited every time he showed
up on the screen. It absolutely blows my mind that a man so small and wiry
could be so terrifying.
I think I’ve used haunting to describe parts of this movie 4
times now, and that’s because it’s extremely apt. I could look for another word
to use but it just won’t be as fitting. Even the ending, while abrupt and
ambiguous, almost worked because of how haunting this film is. This movie was
made to eat away at you, in the same way the residual effects of living at
Patrick’s farm eats away at Martha, until you too become sufficiently (for lack
of a better word) haunted.
It should also be noted that this movie has a lot of nudity
in it. I couldn’t find a way to properly fit that into the review but I felt
like it should be noted so you know what you are getting into as far as a
viewing audience for this movie.

No comments:
Post a Comment